Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cake in a Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cake in a Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG. The owners names or the company name doesn’t appear in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Cupcake_Wars_episodes Wikilover3509 (talk) 12:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if they did appear on that show, notability is not WP:INHERITED BrigadierG (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't see how this meets notability. Also one of the citations is to a cupcake-themed 2048 clone?^[1] That's not part of my rationale or anything, it's just amusing. It does bring their citation count down to 3 though, all of which are Toledo-specific news articles. TheSavageNorwegian 21:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Television, Companies, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: I have fixed spacing in the headers that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.