Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capricorn Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SW— ^{spill the beans} 23:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Capricorn Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. I stubbed the article because it was unsourced although I left in the lead and an external link that is probably largely irrelevant. There is an Indian company [1], but I don't think it's related to the original SF company. Google News search on the company (along with the founder's last name) gets just a few hits from a long time ago. Bbb23 (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can find no reliable sources which even mention this company. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete', possible A7 speedy or even G11 given the high number of unsourced peacock adjectives in the lead sentence. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.