Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cbet.gg
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cbet.gg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Remove per WP:NCORP - even not one reliable source found. Mambo Rumbo (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Caribbean. Shellwood (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The august free press article appears to be a paid promotion; no other sources to find. This article is spam. FalconK (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete (despite the fact that the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet]). I couldn't find any reliable sources, and nothing about this business suggests that such sources would be likely to exist. Toohool (talk) 22:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.