Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charity baptist church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A7). Pepsidrinka 03:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No claim to notability. Short almost to speediable proportions, but sadly, I think it provides enough context to avoid it. Prodded, removed by anon without improvement. Morgan Wick 04:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. DarthVader 04:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Dionyseus 04:28, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Clean up Remove the non-NPOV. Rowdy baptists, trying to make a ruckus. --Xrblsnggt 05:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • (I was joking of course.) Delete --Xrblsnggt 04:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, notability is not established. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages' church directory. -- H·G (^words/_works) 07:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails .... which guideline is most appropriate here? WP:CORP? WilyD 12:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as per no "remotely plausible" assertion of notability AdamBiswanger1 15:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as per Adam's nom.--Bschott 17:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as per Adam's nom. Davidpdx 19:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd love to, but the idiotic CSD criteria that applies, applies only to a "real person, group of people, band, or club". Arguably corporations fit "groups" or "clubs", and a church meets either, but I think some admins have varying policies. I think it should be strengthened. Morgan Wick 03:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Zos 20:15, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No independent reliable sources in the 40 unique Google hits for "Charity baptist church" + Joelton - Wikipedia. There is no specific applicable standard; and so far I haven't seen any need for one. We seem to do fine on churches without one. GRBerry 01:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. —Hanuman Das 01:07, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.