Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles and Lee-Lee Chan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles and Lee-Lee Chan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Disputable notability of subjects - Being the parents of someone famous does not make you famous in your own right Smurfmeister (talk) 12:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete - utterly non-notable. —TreasuryTag talk contribs 17:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- perhaps some info can be taken to their son's article, but the naming is blantantly ill-formed. Mangoe (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - agree with Mangoe that some parts can be incorporated into Jackie Chan's article. Odikuas 14:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - they're the subjects of a film - Traces of a Dragon: Jackie Chan and his Lost Family. The film even has a Wikipedia article (Traces of a Dragon). Eug (talk) 10:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is this film notable? Maybe the article for Traces of a Dragon should also be deleted and partly be taken into Jackie Chan's article. Odikuas 15:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not possible, there's well over 60 films article of his on wiki, and Traces of a Dragon is no exception.--DaliusButkus (talk) 18:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Subject of a feature film, burial attended by former heads of government and US ambassador. [1] Sufficient to establish notability. WWGB (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No-brainer. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable per WWGB. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as notable per WWGB. Sting au Buzz Me... 11:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep subject of a documentary, funeral attended by important guests.--DaliusButkus (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, subjects of a notable documentary, plus everything else pointed out above. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 22:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.