Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Lapointe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. There is consensus that the fr-wiki article provides references adequate to meet en-wiki notability standards. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Lapointe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 20:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and Canada. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 22:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are multiple people by the same name, and they barely come up. I cannot find anything in-depth and independent from the subject. Aintabli (talk) 04:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The French version of this article is extensively sourced. See fr:Christian Lapointe Nfitz (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I originally accidently typed delete instead of keep - which I didn't actually think was possible! I've struck this vote and made it clear below. Sorry for the confusion everyone! Nfitz (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "delete", but restored per Nfitz's request on my talk page as they meant to !vote "keep" above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The French version of this article is extensively sourced. See fr:Christian Lapointe. Nfitz (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are two Wikipedia article entries on him with the fr WP being the most developed. There is a mix of journal, newspapers and magazines sources with reviews which seem valid, which makes him notable. I don't mind adding the dude to my todo list, get it done sometime this year. Its only a couple days work. We can get rid of notability tag to get it off the CAT:NN list. scope_creep^Talk 15:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Nfitz and scope_creep. The article appears to have previously not been linked with the French Wikipedia version. I have linked the articles. Aintabli (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability is demonstrated at the French Wikipedia article. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agreed, the French version of this article is extensively sourced. See fr:Christian Lapointe. I have quickly added three secondary sources, although they are all pointing to French language theatre news articles Avignonesi (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify until the en:WP article meets en:WP standards of notability. If the fr:WP article cites ample sources, then someone (with better French than me) can use them in the en:WP article. Maproom (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't using deletion as cleanup violate policy? This isn't a newly created article, nor is there a question that it can be improved (as per the second language example). Nfitz (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does violate policy. The subject passes WP:N. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.