Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davidovich Bagels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Davidovich Bagels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an advert throughout its history. Little notability, should be merged. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Well it had a write-up in the WSJ so there's that. JMWt (talk) 08:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep appears to meet notability [1] [2] [3] [4] Andre🚐 21:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep the WSJ given above and the 5th citation for CBS news seem ok-ish. The others listed above appear to be blogs, sort-of RS. Oaktree b (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.