Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Levy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Levy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. Google searching returns numerous false positives and I am unsure if he meets WP:GNG. brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Simply add Varian to the search term "Dick Levy" and plenty of "true positive" relevant references from reliable sources are available. Cullen328 (talk) 06:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with Cullen 328, clearly notable. Only do a search and you find plenty of material,.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I'd say being one of "Silicon Valley's wealthiest executives" is notable enough, though there's still the need to source that claim. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep: needs more refs, but notable enough subject matter. AerobicFox (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.