Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Didaskalia (theatre)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Didaskalia (theatre) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Studies, p. 124, indeed reports that this term "has been proposed" and is "widely used" for parts of a play text that are not spoken, including stage directions and character names. Yet the page is a mere WP:DICDEF, and no other article references it, or even uses the word in this sense. - Cal Engime (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: this makes sense. The article also only cites dictionaries. Mrfoogles (talk) 19:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.