Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixson, Robert James
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dixson, Robert James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only claim of significance is that Many of [his] books have been used all over the world by those who wanted to learn English grammar, usage and pronunciation, particularly American English. The claim is very non-neutral and completely unreferenced. There is one reference, and it does not refer to a claim which shows how the subject is notable. I was unable to find any other coverage of the article. Fails WP:N. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 23:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- The article has undergone a major build and now demonstrates a greater body of (granted, not original) work. Misspelling of the author's name by others in listings/searches may be cause for a move or redirect, but not deletion. Dru of Id (talk) 22:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.