Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doejo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doejo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested proposed deletion, not mine. Another privately owned digital services agency (i.e. an Internet advertising agency) advertising on Wikipedia. Offered sources are startup-related local coverage or business and trade blogs. I find nothing better. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article was created by an editor who also created an article about its founder, Phil Tadros, which was deleted and recreated several times. The same editor deleted a "notability" tag from the article on spurious grounds.[1] It's apparent that the editor is closely connected to the company and its founder. As for the company itself, there's only a single passing mention of it in the Proquest newspaper archive. Of the sources used in the article, most are about Tadros with just passing mentions of Doejo. The only one specifically about the company is an interview hosted on what seems to be a consulting firm's website,[2] which wouldn't normally be considered a reliable source. Based on that, the company does not appear to meet the notability guideline: WP:CORP. Will Beback talk 19:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There is no evidence that this is a company with any significant notability. It's biggest claim to notability seems to be that it has worked for some notable companies. However, this does not make Doejo itself notable and, without any reliable sources, I see no scope for keeping the article. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 23:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Company fails notability at WP:COMPANY. SaveATreeEatAVegan 10:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.