Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donut Diner (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Donut Diner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Restaurant chain doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Companies. Shellwood (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP, at least with what's available online (unless I'm missing something crucial). I also doubt this adds much substance to the AfD itself, but I spent years living in St. Catharines and I'd say that when people talk about donuts, it's typically Beechwood for local ones [1][2] (but even that's not enough for NCORP) and Tim Hortons for everything else. I might be a bit biased since I never got to try these ones, though... too bad they went bankrupt. Clovermoss (talk) 01:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - I am unable to find much coverage on this. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP.Zeddedm (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I found another mention here: https://archive.macleans.ca/article/1985/4/29/the-500-billion-man . It indicates that the franchise may have had some links to modern Canadian history, but I don't see any evidence that it would be significant enough to justify having its own article. Chagropango (talk) 09:39, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It gets a small mention in a book but not enough for CORPDEPTH and I'm unable to locate anything that meets NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 18:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.