Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EEMBC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

EEMBC[edit]

EEMBC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to mostly consist of advertising Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 17:38, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 17:38, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Although admitted to be borderline due to lack of inline citations. Most of the promotion for the 2013 era and litany of "members" seems to be gone now. Needs work, but searching for news on EEMBC I find a bunch of sources. W Nowicki (talk) 21:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Femke (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Significant coverage in reliable sources found via Google New search: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Any WP:PROMO issues in this short article can be addressed through editing; WP:TNT not required. ~Kvng (talk) 21:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.