Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Wilson (gymnast)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Wilson (gymnast) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to fall under WP:TOOSOON. Although she is in the early stages of her career and has received some team medals, she does not meet the WP:NGYMNAST criteria which require individual medals. Also, there isn't enough significant coverage to meet the WP:GNG criteria. Mercenf (talk) 10:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 11:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Agree with nominator; fails WP:GNG. Only sources I could find lacked WP:SIGCOV. User:Let'srun 14:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This nom is vandalism. 5 medals at international events for team usa... team USA website is as credible of a reference as they come. She is inherently notable.The published medal results from these events make her inherently notable.. Just like playing in the NFL or another major league. 69.238.162.225 (talk) 00:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism comment. Has tagged team the entire set of pages in editing war.. Both are from upwork.. He nominated 2 pages and didnt even leave the required notifications on the talk pages. This is vandalism. This user has over 5m views on his pages.. All articles are well referenced before they were attacked. 135.148.232.242 (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify to afford time to gain some notability. It is very seldom I suggest draftification, however I do think an article on this athlete may be just a little WP:TOOSOON, yet can't think of an appropriate redirect target in the meantime (though i'd support either as an WP:ATD). The next Olympics is a good shout, but is still a year away. Strictly speaking, as per nomination, she doesn't quite meet the criteria set out at WP:NGYMNAST yet. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NGYMNAST or WP:GNG. I also note that the article is a product of paid editing and the article (and this AFD) are being edited by ipsocks of the blocked paid editor. - MrOllie (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I've temporarily semi-protected this AFD due to persistent IP-hopping !votes from a blocked editor. I recognize protection on an XFD page is somewhat unusual, but given the circumstances I believe it is the least disruptive option. If any legitimate editor has an issue, please reach out on my talkpage and I'm happy to discuss. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 20:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NGYMNAST or WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.