Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European International Business Academy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete -- Y not? 20:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- European International Business Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG. Bbb23 (talk) 02:12, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. My research confirms that although this WP:ORG publishes plenty itself, and there are plenty of passing, trivial mentions, there's a giant hole where the substantial multiple third-party coverage should be. JFHJr (㊟) 02:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 17:51, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 03:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep From what I am finding this looks like it might have coverage, just in other languages such as 1 and 2 I could keep looking but I'm sure at this point has something to it. The article needs work though.Silent Bob (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It is suggested that editors working on this article search google news Here and good luck.Silent Bob (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.