Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fish bomb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blast fishing. Mark Arsten (talk) 12:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fish bomb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of this page is a duplicate of Blast fishing. This page should redirect there and its contents should be moved there if considered notable. Transcendence (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect without merge. Most of the content fails WP:NOTNEWS (and are covered here, anyways), while the rest is a duplicate. Ansh6 6 6 19:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep This is a misleading AFD. A fish bomb is a type of bombed used by terrorists in Libya. It has nothing to do with fishing. This is part of a pattern of Transcendence to attempt to delete articles about terrorist or terrorist-like incidents, and a pattern of stalking and deleting articles created or improved by this editor (myself) Redhanker (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a misleading AfD, it's a misleading article. A fish bomb is a type of bomb used by fishermen in blast fishing, but adopted by soldiers and then terrorists. Ansh6 6 6 15:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article contains the line "Prior to the war they were commonly used by poor fisherman to kill or disable fish in order to catch them easily." Furthermore, the title is Fish Bomb. If this article isn't about fish bombs, then it shouldn't be named "Fish Bomb" as it has nothing to do with fish bombs which typically refers to bombs used in blast fishing. If you really claim this isn't about fish bombs, then this article should be a part of something like Improvised explosive device. Transcendence (talk) 18:41, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom and Ansh666 - a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC at the very least. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:58, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.