Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foffa Bikes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foffa Bikes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see how this company is notable, and the two very minor press pieces are not sufficient to meet "extensive coverage" the panda ₯’ 19:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree; I don't see how this company is notable. 331dot (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A shame, it sounds like the thing that ought to be notable, but it just isn't. A news and book search turned up nothing, a web search turned up little other than forum posts and press releases. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.