Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Magill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). D💘ggy54321 ^(xoxo😘) 12:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Magill[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 11:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 11:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to be mentioned in a number of books sufficient to satisfy SIGCOV in multiple RS. Mztourist (talk) 11:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has received SIGCOV, though the article does need some work with sourcing and maybe a rewrite. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 20:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RS are present. Intothat darkness 17:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes SIGCOV. Found enough reliable, independent sources with significant coverage.-Tushar.ghone (talk) 13:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.