Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemini Edibles & Fats
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gemini Edibles & Fats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparenet WP:MILL. Delete according to WP:N, WP:NCORP. Driodr (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Telangana. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. None of the sources appear to meet the standards laid out at WP:ORGCRIT.4meter4 (talk) 21:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I have improved the page by adding more information and reliable sources. Earlier, a large amount of the information was undone for no rational reason, which I restored with some required alteration. The subject is a known edible oil brand in India and it meets Wikipedia's WP:NCORP. I'll vote for keep.--Vikrampasari (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources to meet WP:NCORP. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No sources found. significant coverage needed. Ginbopewz (talk) 11:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.