Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groronodor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-04 02:03Z

Groronodor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unsigned local band, all links are dead — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baligant (talk • contribs)

• Delete - No evidence of coverage in third-party sources to establish notability per WP:BAND. If they're unsigned, they're probably non-notable anyway. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 18:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - As above Rothko65 18:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I thought it was a hoax to begin with, but a GSearch revealed 44 unique Ghits many of which failing WP:RS, but some of which linked to mp3 library. Conclusion: highly improbable this would pass WP:MUSIC. Ohconfucius 08:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy A7 Delete So according to this article, the band was formed, did virtually nothing, and then split up. There isn't even a claim for notablity. A1octopus 19:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.