Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hodyon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hodyon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an entry for a "Defunct" company which was acquired by a company that then declared bankruptcy in 2018. The product "NuVinci CVT" is currently owned and marketed by another company under a different brand by the company which "survived" the bankruptcy (through the input of private capital). The CVT product is very notable and it has an in depth Wikipedia entry NuVinci_Continuously_Variable_Transmission . In my opinion this article (for a defunct corporation) has no relevance or notability (and contains dead links) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 20:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article was also created by a "special purpose" account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pattidhill Flibbertigibbets (talk) 20:20, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And they haven't edited anything in the last decade, only this article and the CVT one before that. I don't think we'll get pushback from them. Oaktree b (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete their website went belly up and I don't see anything about this. The CVT already has coverage, this defunct company isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 22:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no reliable coverage found. 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 08:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The company itself is not notable, especially since it has long since ceased to be a going concern with no notability established beforehand. TH1980 (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:23, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per HighKing and NCORP; see also WP:SPAM. Bearian (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.