Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypotext
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hypotext (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced neologism; quick google shows it is not in significant use, nor is it discussed in reliable sources. — Coren (talk) 15:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete nonnotable neologism. `'Míkka>t 16:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonnotable neologism that started its life as a copyvio (see history). PHARMBOY (TALK) 19:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The term is not in current use, but I believe it is significant - see sources. A distinction should be made between popularity and significance. We present concepts, not words. Keep tekks (talk) 22:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note It doesnt matter if it is "popular" now, but at some time, the word had to be in widespread use. Not singular, but widespread, which is one way to define "notable" and the most popular. I just don't see that here. As for "significance", that word isn't used here much, see WP:IMPORTANT for the failed concensus or WP:INTERESTING for a similar view. PHARMBOY (TALK) 22:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note The sources are reliable and independent. The lack of significant coverage on the internet is not an argument. The term was in widespread use by literary and new media theorists. tekks (talk) 22:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nomination. MvjsTalking 15:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.