Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent design
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:FOOLS. April Fools Day has ended (non-admin closure) --KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Intelligent design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · [1])
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not intelligent, and not designed intelligently. Delete per WP:FRINGE. [April Fools!] Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Split to creationism and Timecube. —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Do you even lift, bruh? - God 17:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.