Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IonIdea (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --- Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IonIdea

I'd have speedied under A11, however it was kept via a VfD 3 years ago and I think it's therefore ineligible for speedy. Regardless, it's spam including company contact information and purely promotional. Kept on the ground of ghits, but ghits!notability and RS coverage appears limited to press releases and directory information. No evidence it passes WP:CORP TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 01:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. See http://www.ionidea.com/press.htm for additional news coverage, primarily in Indian media. --Eastmain (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment they appear to be multiple copies of the same press release and a joint venture announcement from 5+ years ago. Unless perhaps I was missing something? I still don't see significant RS coverage and if a company doesn't include anything recent on it's own site... TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 02:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yet another software development and consulting business using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. FWIW, this seems to be a Virginia corporation, not an Indian corporation, although they apparently operate in India. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable corporation spam prettied up with quotation marks. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.