Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagruti Degree & PG College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jagruti Degree & PG College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced stub. Fails WP:NSCHOOL/WP:GNG. With regards to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools have historically been kept", please note there is no proof this is an " independently accredited degree-awarding institution". This may well be a Degree mill. With no evidence for or against we cannot extend good faith to spam-prone topics. Article on such website-only 'schools' should be assume to be spam ads for degree mills, unless someone can prove otherwise. PS. Anyone feeling like defending this, keep also in mind the creator of this stub has been indef blocked as a "Vandalism-only account"... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to draft, perhaps sources can be found. Hyperbolick (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Hyperbolick: WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Usernamekiran: and did I vote "keep"? Hyperbolick (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Hyperbolick: it is not about what vote is being cast, it is about the arguments to avoid —usernamekiran(talk) 14:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Usernamekiran: And what vote is associated with all those "arguments to avoid"? Hyperbolick (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Hyperbolick: like I said in previous comment, it is not about any vote. It is about the rationale. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Possibility of research unveiling better information is a great rationale for a move to draft. Hyperbolick (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  @Hyperbolick: then do that research rather than having this conversation. WP:SOFIXIT —usernamekiran(talk) 17:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It takes 'bout a minute to disprove a part of the OP's stance. That being said, degree mills don't operate in India w/o an accreditation (the modus operandi is something entirely else) and so no conclusion on that locus. ∯WBG^converse 17:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete partly per nominator. Also: I cant be sure if this work of a COI and/or UPE. This is a private, for profit college that fails all the notability criteria. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NSCHOOLS and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.