Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jollof index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Malinaccier (talk) 14:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jollof index

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nt sure if this index/metric is notable. Maybe it should be merged elsewhere or just deleted BoraVoro (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but improve with better sources. I was able to find several sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], plus the organization that created the index (not independent of course). I'm not certain about the reliability of those sources—I understand Nigerian news services are often suspect—but with that much coverage I'm sure we can find sources that meet RS discussing the topic. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of non-Nigerian sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, as examples. OskarJacobsen (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Economics, Ghana, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added two more sources to this article. I don't think there are any good merge targets for it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:33, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well sourced article with two articles entirely about the article subject. Even if the reliance on Nigerian sources for notability were called into question, new sources added by WhatamIdoing are from WaPo and Bloomberg. Oblivy (talk) 02:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nothing wrong is with this one. Has sources so that's good. About notability, this also seems to be fine but I can have doubts about it. Rrjmrrr (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This is a well-sourced article. Clearly passes WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.