Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyword Tool (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keyword Tool

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article likely fails to meet the WP:PRODUCT criteria as it lacks quality, in-depth references. I found a few such as those in TNW ([1]) and TechRadar ([2]), but it appears that they were either written by guest post writers/bloggers, thus being opinion pieces, or not written by staff.

The TechRadar Pro version of TechRadar appears similar to Wirecutter, so I'm uncertain whether it contributes to notability. Mercenf (talk) 14:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The TNW source and both sources in the article only mention the tool or company in a list, with little actual content on either. The TechRadar review looks like a good source though and I see no reason to doubt its independence. As is, that one source doesn't bring it to WP:GNG, WP:NSOFT, or WP:NPRODUCT and I couldn't find anything else that appeared reliable (just a couple of blog posts). Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 16:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt The last AfD discussed possible paid editing - this is also likely paid editing to get this on here (one user with five edits made this page) and it doesn't otherwise pass notability guidelines. SportingFlyer T·C 19:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.