Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LFNetwork

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page was proposed to be deleted but because some people believe it should stay I put it up to an AfD Popcorn2008 02:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Popcorn2008[reply]

Keep Although I put it up for deletion I only did so because before it was proposed for deletion, but I decided to put it toward a vote since I believe it should still be kept. Popcorn2008 02:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Popcorn2008[reply]

• Delete unexceptional web forum.--Peta 06:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Wikipedia is not a web guide. Whether this is a good board or a bad board isn't very important. If it were to be placed as an external link in the Lucas Arts article, that would be sufficient. Geogre 11:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Geogre, Wikipedia is not a web guide. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Geogre and Sarah Dlyons493 Talk 12:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information, like a web guide to random web boards.Obina 18:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doesn't meet WP:WEB and fails WP:V. Alexa rank of 1,846,496. -- Scientizzle 19:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above. Dionyseus 01:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.