Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBT Law in Pennsylvania
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per copyright infringement of http://www.hillwallack.com/web-content/news/article_v18n1_10.html. 18:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
LGBT Law in Pennsylvania[edit]
- LGBT Law in Pennsylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This page contains original research, is clearly biased, does not meet any of Wikipedia's style guidelines, and appears to simply act as an advertisment for Ms Hardwick RJE42 (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:OR, WP:NOT#PUBLISHER. The article is even attributed to the author. Likely copyvio but I couldn't locate the article. Redfarmer (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, also Wikipedia is not a soapbox. JohnCD (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. One might also add WP:NOT#GUIDE. There are few parts of WP:NOT that this doesn't violate. Deor (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it's being used with consent of Attorney Hardwick and the firm that employes her, then it's not just an essay, it's a promotional piece that could fairly be compared to advertising for the law firm of Hill Wallack LLP. If it's being used without the consent of the firm and the attorney, then it's unauthorized. Mandsford (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:SOAPBOXing, vanispamcrufisement essay. --Dhartung | Talk 21:25, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above - WP:SOAPBOX, OR, etc, etc, etc.King Pickle (talk) 02:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as personal essay, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:OR, etc. My first clue is the fact this carries a byline. 23skidoo (talk) 14:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I finally found the copyvio so I have now tagged the article for speedy deletion. Redfarmer (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.