Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeverageEdu
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- LeverageEdu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG and NCORP. The page relies exclusively on regurgitated press release stories, funding/partnership announcements and listicles. Maduant (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, India, and California. Maduant (talk) 18:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: a directory-like listing for un unremarkable private company. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; sources are in passing and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.