Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ace Combat characters (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ace Combat characters

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page has not much in the way of independent reliable sources such as to establish its general notability. I performed a WP:BEFORE search using the WP:VGSE ([1]) and found no amount of sources covering the concept of "Ace Combat series characters" as its own significant topic. I attempted to redirect the article to the series article Ace Combat but was reverted. If there is any need to have content on the specific characters, those should be covered in the specific articles about each game, but I only saw content sufficient for one character in the above search. Izno (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ace Combat characters do not meet GNG. Burn it with fire. TarkusAB^talk 22:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not even close to meeting the WP:GNG or following WP:WAF. Just a massive chinch of unsourced observations about these games that belongs on Wikia, not Wikipedia. Even if someone dig up sources, a WP:TNT deletion would warranted. Sergecross73 msg me 00:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per rationale above. Overly detailed and unencyclopedic. Eagleash (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Belongs in Wikia._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:57, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.