Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pet peeves
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This list was removed from Pet peeve per consensus on that talk page given that it was unencylopedic and unverifiable. OhNoitsJamieTalk 05:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Necessarily POV, culturally specific, and unverifiable. Delete per nom. --TeaDrinker 05:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, see talk:Pet peeve, making this its own article certainly does not help. Christopher Parham (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The list is cute, but needs to be replaced with a list of pet peeves of notable personalities (and which personalities have them -- some will be associated with more than one person) -- anyone who is quoted in another publication about one of their pet peeves, and has their own article, could have an entry on that list. And it would be pretty interesting... +sj + 06:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There's plenty of room at Pet peeve for any material that at least meets a basic standard of verifiability, a separate page is not needed. Christopher Parham (talk) 06:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it is totally POV - be like having a list of favourite ice cream flavours. User:Themepark
- Delete fairly uncontroversially for me. It seems to be an indiscriminate collection of information and I think it (and many other crufty lists) should go. Sorry. Politepunk 08:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --Rachel Cakes 08:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV fork, unverifiable and supposed listcruft. --Terence Ong 08:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 10:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Note that a "new user" has spammed over 80 users advising them of this AfD nomination, one of which was Rachel Cakes above. android79 12:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Or, at least, it was meant to be one, at one time. Friday (talk) 17:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the list. Pet peeve should either be kept or moved to Wiktionary. — Itai (talk) 18:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as much as I find the list amusing. A few verifiable examples should be in Pet peeve. -- Mithent 19:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete by its nature this list could never reflect NPOV. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom B.ellis 21:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per multiple excellent reasons above. My pet peeve is listcruft... Just zis Guy you know? 23:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete people have different pet peeves - you can't list them all --Khoikhoi 06:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above reasons. --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 12:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Move pet peeve to Wiktionary? ---Dana 02:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Terence. Joe 02:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per POV -- Ian ≡ talk 04:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.