Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Progress Wrestling events

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Progress Wrestling events

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the parent article being clearly notable, the list of events are simply non-notable events. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep List items aren't required to be individually notable. If this 'Progress Wrestling' series of contests is distinct and notable, I can see justification for listing them in a separate list article. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a single show has their own page, a list of "no links" isn't appropriate. MPJ-DK (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no policy supporting any such claim. One specific, and recognised, use of list articles is to gather those thing which aren't individually notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A list of 10 non-notable events do not add up to one notable list IMO. Didn't say it was a policy, stating my opinion that if NO items on the list are notable, then the list isn't notable either. MPJ-DK (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Progress Wrestling is notable but a series of articles related to it have previously been deleted; notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Sourcing looks impressive at first glance but exclusively uses Cagematch which doesn't prove notability WP:PW/RS. This also fails WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Abcmaxx (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Source wise relies almost entirely on Cagematch, pushing it below the threshold of WP:GNG. Fulfills WP:CRUFT in my humble opinion. Addicted4517 (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.