Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bonsai on stamps
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 20:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- List of bonsai on stamps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly made list cruft, unneeded. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 13:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOTEVERYTHING.Chimneyrock (talk) 16:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Question. How was it known that bonsai is on stamps, and is this article an example of original research? Vorbee (talk) 18:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:NOR. Ajf773 (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT but hang on coola this book contains a stamp list (oh, crap!), no, wait, its selfpublished (whew!!:)). Coolabahapple (talk)
- Delete - How can we verify, no RS available . and a lot of "???" - at most can exist as a draft but given the sources needed, this will never see light. --Quek157 (talk) 17:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.