Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional martial arts (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional martial arts

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely original research, and the vast majority of blue linked articles have long since been merged for non-notability. Fails WP:LISTN. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:56, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. original research and contents are all of questionable notability.PRehse (talk) 22:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The vast majority is questionable and most likely not notable to find credible sources on. Gameinfirmary (talk) 23:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be original research and most, if not all, of the arts are of dubious notability. I fail to see how WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 00:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.