Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of item numbers in Indian cinema (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of item numbers in Indian cinema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG. There is no inclusion criteria, no stand-alone notability for any of the items included (sans a handful). What is this? An indefinite guide to all supposed "item songs" that seriously contradicts policy against indiscriminate lists of loosely associated items. Aditya(talkcontribs) 18:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 19:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 19:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 19:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the item number terminology is discussed in books, there are no books that focus on listing every single item number out there. This would be like trying to maintain a list of songs in films or films that have post-credit scenes. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleteas it is very hard to say what is an "item number" and what is not. Critics often disagree over it and there is no particular authoritative source for it. I think it is best to keep this information in the song article itself. For example, if Sheila ki Jawaani is considered an item number by critic A, it can be mentioned in that article.--DreamLinker (talk) 08:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.