Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unused highways (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of unused highways

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All five of the sub articles have been nominated for deletion, and all of the intro content and refs. are duplicative of Unused highway. This is actually the fourth AfD nomination of this page (previous 3 had radically different content and/or title). UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All lists are unlikely to survive AfD. Redirect to Unused highway if desired. Ajf773 (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—nothing here is worth keeping. Even if the sub-lists were retained, they should be links from Unused highway, not from this page. Imzadi 1979 → 00:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and possibly merge with Unused highway. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - redundant article Spiderone 09:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - maybe collect all unused/abandoned highway coordinate links into one big list, sub-categorized by country and listed by city, for the road enthusiasts? You get to delete all your "pointless" articles, and we still get a page for ourselves. Xninetynine (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)X99[reply]

This article was already like that, was split a long time ago. Ajf773 (talk) 04:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:C930:24C2:698:D0A1:B3FD (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Serves no purpose even if the subarticles are kept. Reywas92^Talk 21:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete With the related articles gone, it serves absolutely no purpose. PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.