Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Hamlett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Martha Hamlett[edit]
- Martha Hamlett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is about an author who may not be notable enough for inclusion. She has published one children's book through a vanity press. Richard Cavell (talk) 06:26, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Doesn't appear to meet WP:CREATIVE. Matt (Talk) 07:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No awards, abysmal Amazon sales rank (#473,810 in Books) and no reviews in notable publications.- Mgm|(talk) 09:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Doesnt meet notability required BritishWatcher (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I very rarely advocate deletion of published authors, but this seems entirely meritless self-promotion: the page creator is the 'aspiring illustrator and photographer' mentioned in the article. The text is largely lifted from the publisher's site. Espresso Addict (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reading self-written poems to toddlers does not make you notable. abf /talk to me/ 10:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.