Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McAllister Olivarius (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

McAllister Olivarius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Im unable to find significant coverage on the company that meets WP:NCORP. Article does not meet the guidelines for companies. DavidEfraim (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, England, and United States of America. DavidEfraim (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. The fact that it was recreated seems just a tiny bit suspicious, dont you think? Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Bad faith nom by sock HighKing⁺⁺ 20:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Bad faith nomination by sockpuppet. MrsSnoozyTurtle 12:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A non-sock voted delete. Cannot make a decision based on the nominator's sockpuppetry alone.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There are numerous reliable sources. My one concern is that the articles are mainly about court cases in which the firm participated. However, since the firm is talked about in those cases I assume that establishes notability. Lamona (talk) 02:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.