Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanin Haircare (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ambrosiawater (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Melanin Haircare

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a non notable company wants to promote itself. unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. GermanKity (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 05:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep I have no opinion on the article itself (I haven't looked into it), but it was nominated for deletion recently and that discussion was closed as keep on 1 August, eight days ago. TompaDompa (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article has numerous reliable sources and I doubt that standards have changed that much in the last week since it was last nominated. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteIf i see similar articles this is more promotional article on Wikipedia. I wonder how it saved in 1st nomination. Here fails WP:ORGIND and not this too WP:NCORP.2405:205:1003:77AD:E45D:385E:D24D:40E7 (talk) 04:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your first edit was to vote on this AFD, quite strange. I would request admins to look into this. Jaysonsands (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Agree with TompaDompa and BuySomeApples above, there are good WP:RS present. Jaysonsands (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.