Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Keebaugh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither in accordance with WP:BIO1E nor WP:BASIC. After a good-faith search for sources, the deletion rationale and supporting !vote seem valid. COI declaration: I am acquainted with an employee of a UK Raytheon business, but this has not influenced the close, which has been judged on its own merits. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 16:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Keebaugh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been around for a while but the only links I found from reliable sources were brief mentions of him being quoted about the company Raytheon. Fails WP:GNG. Would recommend that article be deleted. JakenBox (talk) 21:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.