Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhailo Deyak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhailo Deyak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find reliable sources to establish notability, mainly promotional results. Looks like he could be notable, if information is verified, but no evidence of it. Unref blp. Boleyn (talk) 09:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Ukraine. Owen× ☎ 10:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The person does not appear to be notable from reading the article. I can't find any refs in the article either and an unsourced BLP is not something we want. In the meantime, I'll remove anything that looks contentious or promotional to me. QwertyForest (talk) 12:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:BEFORE does not bring up any RS references to show notability. He is listed on a few gallery sites and some pay-to-play sites. The artist has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. WP:TOOSOON. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.