Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouth Sweet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mouth Sweet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this for notability while gnoming about, and the article creator came back to the talk page to agree that they did not feel notability was met now that they were more experienced. The article has 8 sources. Only the 8th is a reliable secondary source that says anything significant, and it's a listicle of 10 games chosen by "Colin Spacetwinks" for Giant Bomb. Sources 1 and 3 are primary, while sources 2 is likely unreliable. Sources 4, 6 and 7 are probably unreliable, but also non-independent interviews. Source 5's reliability is irrelevant, as it's a trivial name drop. WP:VG/S uncovers nothing more. -- ferret (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No game reviews that I can see in any of the acceptable sources. TV Tropes is about the best site with a review I can find and it's not an RS. Oaktree b (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Creator Delete No objection here. Open and shut to me that there's not enough reliable sources. I'll look into source discussions for the potentially unreliable sites that remain unconfirmed. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 17:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There does not seem to be enough mentions in reliable sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.