Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nantero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Nano-RAM. (non-admin closure) czar · · 08:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nantero

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional type sources, looking found only more of the same. Not independently notable per WP:GNG as sources are either PR style or routine. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 20:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 04:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 04:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 04:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about merge of Nantero into one section in Nano-RAM? The two combined would be more likely to be justified. The Nano-RAM article has way too many technical details, and even fewer sources than the company one. A single balanced neutral article that gives the business history and a quick overview of the technology (referring to sources for details) would be nice to keep.

Should clarify that much of the company article is due to single-purpose account User:Nto-joe who discloses a conflict of interest on their user page. W Nowicki (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Nano-RAM, which is the company's sole product. Nantero seems not to have any notability separate from this product, but the product itself is certainly notable. -- 202.124.74.9 (talk) 09:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.