Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NowPublic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - brenneman {L} 02:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NowPublic[edit]
Short article with 2 links to themselves. If that's not enough you can click "Corporate Blog" external link and see what they say about WP. --Richhoncho 18:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You shouldn't delete an article just because it's about people who don't like Wikipedia!--Runcorn 21:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Fair comment, Runcorn, but it is empty and fails WP:SPAM as it stands. --Richhoncho 21:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, nearly qualifies for {{db-empty}}.--Andeh 18:36, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Michael 18:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, improve upon and expand this article if you have a problem with it's brevity. Most Wikipedia articles start out with only a few sentences, and an increasingly popular service like NowPublic will certainly generate a more extensive article. NowPublic founder Michael Tippett's dialogue with GraemeL is in no way indicative of his or NowPublic's opinion of wikipedia, and should for no reason influence the fate of this article. I hope we can take this notice down and get on to something more constructive... Xichael 10:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Andy. Mangojuicetalk 12:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.