Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Gravitation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear Gravitation[edit]

Contested PROD, removed by author. Article was originally PROD'd for being pure WP:OR. Cites no secondary sources; fails WP:RS. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom (as the Prod-er). The article appears to be ~~User: Mr. Opinion~~ Kenneth F. Wright's WP:OR ~~essay~~. Toddst1 (talk) 20:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as pure WP:OR. -- Kesh (talk) 02:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pure OR, of a misguided sort.DGG (talk) 06:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A novel theory (to put it kindly), but the existence of the strong and weak interactions, as a key component of the Standard Model of particle physics, is widely accepted by scientists. A single web page which also details encounters with UFOs and provides designs for an ununpentium-powered flying saucer hardly seems an adequate source. Zetawoof_(ζ) 11:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as pure original research. I wish the author good luck in getting it reported in some reliable sources if he wants it on Wikipedia. ~ Mazca (talk) 11:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Verkhovensky (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bm gub (talk) 03:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.