Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oppera (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable band, no evidence that this passes WP:MUSIC, no independent sources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 05:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the two albums by Oppera, as they also fail WP:MUSIC:

Violince (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Oppera (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Delete per nom.--RyRy5 ^{Talk to RyRy} 05:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Despite the author's clear attempt to assert notability, this is a non-notable band which doesn't pass WP:MUSIC. PeterSymonds | talk 06:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• If deleted, Redirect Oppera to Opera as a plausible misspelling. No stance on actual deletion. -- saberwyn 08:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into the Martika article. But delete the 2 albums for failing WP:MUSIC  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 09:16, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as independently notable group with notable membership. No opinion on keeping the albums, but the overall band article is worth keeping and expanding (info on the two albums can be merged to assist with this). 23skidoo (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per Esradekan. Editorofthewiki 01:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.