Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipi & Bibi's
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pipi & Bibi's[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Pipi & Bibi's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails to establish its notability as required by Wikipedia General Notability Guideline. This article cites not a single source. Fleet Command (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC) Fleet Command (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; no notability established, and subject appears unsourceable. Happy to switch to Keep if sources show notability, but that seems unlikely. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Toaplan per WP:PRODUCT. Marasmusine (talk) 11:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That I am also going to nominate for deletion. Fleet Command (talk) 04:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.