Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Haley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Haley

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails NACTOR, no coverage and hasn't had any major roles. Praxidicae (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I actually meant to prod this but wasn't paying attention and afd'd it instead. Praxidicae (talk) 16:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NACTOR - his roles were, except for playing the Canadian PM once, all very minor. Bearian (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I think he has had enough supporting roles in notable productions to scrape through with WP:NACTOR, but there are no references in the article; it needs work. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We cannot keep articles based solely on one non-reliable source, especially when the subject is a living person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NACTOR is not automatically passed just because the article lists roles — the notability test is still the ability to show some evidence of reliable source coverage about him and his work to demonstrate the "significance" of the roles. Dief the Chief was a minor supporting character, not a main protagonist, in The Arrow — so just because he was a significant figure in the real world does not help to inflate the significance of Haley's portrayal of him if you don't show any sources to support the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough about him to show notability for WP:NACTOR or GNG Wm335td (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.