Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roll No 21
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There is a consensus to Keep this article although whether or not a TV series is popular is not comparable to demonstrated notability and I'm not sure whether or not those awards are considered important. Please add any newly found sources to the article as I think the nominator was justified to nominate this article for deletion consideration based on its current condition. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roll No 21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG, It lacks significant coverage from multiple reliable, independent sources. It does not have in-depth analysis or substantial coverage in reputable publications. The references cited are primarily primary sources or do not offer the necessary independent verification of the show's notability. M S Hassan (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation, and India. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Article in The Hindu. Award. One of the first Indian original production of Cartoon Network. Maybe that would have deserved a more elaborate rationale for deletion this time? See also https://showtimepandit.com/roll-no-21-shocking-story-behind-its-downfall/ (expert "blog"); mentioned here (see table) https://www.business-standard.com/article/specials/tv-shows-for-kids-enter-golden-age-in-india-116101700922_1.html. Absolutely opposed to deletion. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have elaborated the rationale for deletion, Thank you for your feedback. M S Hassan (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I think the article in The Hindu is both in-depth and independent, though, and it's a pretty reputable newspaper. The program has received an award and multiple sources describe it as very popular (see above, or this) and significant. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have elaborated the rationale for deletion, Thank you for your feedback. M S Hassan (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: passes WP:NTV and is a reputed and notable series. Imsaneikigai (talk) 11:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes WP:GNG. Cartoon is popular and has won significant awards at Cartoon Network Super Toon Awards with CN Super Toon of the Year, Chatur Toon and Loser Villain. RangersRus (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.